BG
ES
CS
DA
DE
ET
EL
EN
FR
HR
IT
LV
LT
HU
MT
NL
PL
PT
RO
SK
SL
FI
SVInfo
- Referral date: 27-12-2016
- Show case reference
- Opinion date: 07-02-2018
- Ruling date: 20-09-2018
- AG: Wathelet
References in this case
- C-181/12 - Welte
- C-190/12 - Emerging Markets
- C-252/14 - Pensioenfonds Metaal en Technie
- C-292/16 - A
- C-317/15 - X
- C-318/10 - SIAT
- C-338/11 - Santander
- C-35/11 - Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation
- C-384/09 - Prunus and Polonium
- C-436/08 - Haribo
- C-437/08 - Salinen
- C-446/04 - Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation
- C-464/14 - SECIL
- C-48/11 - A
- C-504/16 - Deister Holding
- C-6/16 - Eqiom (prev. Holcim)
- C-613/16 - Juhler Holding
- C-650/16 - Bevola
Highlight in text
Go|
8.5.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 144/18 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Münster (Germany) lodged on 27 December 2016 — EV v Finanzamt Lippstadt
(Case C-685/16)
(2017/C 144/23)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Finanzgericht Münster
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: EV
Defendant: Finanzamt Lippstadt
Question referred
Are the provisions regarding the free movement of capital and payment transactions in Article 63 et seq. of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as precluding Paragraph 9 No 7 of the Gewerbesteuergesetz 2002, as amended by the 2008 Jahressteuergesetz (annual tax act) of 20 December 2007 (BGBl. I 2007, 3150) in so far as those provisions cause the trade tax deduction of the profit and add-backs by the amount of the profits from shares in a capital company whose management and registered office are located outside the Federal Republic of Germany to be tied to stricter requirements than for the deduction of the profit and the add-backs by the amount of the profits from shares in a non-tax-exempt domestic capital company or by that part of the trade earnings of a domestic undertaking allocated to a permanent establishment not located in Germany?